Jerningham Street Post Box

A couple of years ago the Post Office in Jerningham Street closed. A few months ago the post box disappeared from outside it. I have now made a Freedom of Information request to the Royal Mail asking for information about it – http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/removal_of_post_box_in_jerningha

Royal Mail is obliged to provide me with a reply within 20 days…

Letter to SCC Highways – Pricing Objection

This letter details CRA’s collective concerns about the proposed pricing of the parking scheme. As it stresses, we are most grateful for all of the great work which has been done already and a win-win situation is clearly still easily achievable for all sides.

Tom Harris – 04/03/2010

26th February 2010

Kevin Smith
Traffic Regulation Manager
Development Services
Development Services Directorate
Riverway
Stafford
ST16 3TJ

Objection To Residents Parking Scheme (RPS) Charges Castletown Ref HoHM/MJH/TL/CAS 3

Dear Mr Smith,

We, Castletown Residents Association would like to object to the proposed charges of the Castletown residents parking scheme.

We understand that the council is likely to charge around £50 for joining the scheme and £50 a year thereafter for a standard permit. On the face of it this seems like a reasonable price, but we have questioned whether this is fair. Is it what people pay elsewhere? Has the council undertaken diligent cost studies? Is there an alternative to the charges?

These are questions we have tried to answer in a logical fashion by undertaking research. The aim of which was to benchmark a suitable price if any for the Castletown scheme.

Our Analysis:

From the attachments you will note that it is actually quite rare for a council to charge a joining fee. Secondly there is great variation in the annual permit prices charged. For instance if one took Nottingham, the scheme is totally free (any permit), where as the price charged in Cheltenham is £62 p/a (1x residents parking permit, no joining fee).

In order to assess areas affordability for a parking scheme one could use the average amount of council tax paid for each dwelling in an area. Since council tax is proportional to a dwellings value, the wealth of council tax areas and residents within them can be compared.

As one would expect the most deprived areas such as Stoke have a low average council tax per dwelling (£849), whereas the most affluent areas such as Richmond in London are high (£1782).

Since the average amount of council tax for each dwelling in Stafford borough is £1201, it indicated to us that the scheme charges in Castletown need not be as high as those in Richmond nor as low as those in Stoke (see attachment).

What was interesting to find out in a draft parking scheme report by East Staffordshire Council (2008) was their operating cost of £29.50 per permit based on 500 permits, which translates into their resident paying £50-60 per permit, with no joining fee.

On inspection of Stafford Borough Council’s £50 joining fee and £50 p/a standard permit fee (£100 1st year), one could conclude that the council are charging 100% more than one of the richest areas in the UK (Richmond Upon Thames/Teddington). In addition it is noted that Notts get theirs for free. Something doesn’t seem fair to us.

The figures suggest that £35 for a permit p/a is a fair price (no joining fee). Or if the council were determined about a joining charge, then £70 initial fee with a resident permit fee of £15-18p/a.

It is beyond the scope of the analysis presented in this letter to examine the direct correlation between parking scheme charges in the given local authority areas Vs the affordability of specific resident catchment zones within the given local authority areas. To establish the affordability of specific resident catchment zones in detail one could use householder income or as a “broader brush” the predominant council tax banding for that zone. Since the majority of dwellings in Castletown fall within band A (lowest council tax band, £931.03p/a) it is worth stressing that the areas affordability for any parking scheme could therefore be even less than that suggested above.

We would hope that if the council were to undertake proper due diligence studies and provide tax payers with the best possible value they would indeed arrive at the same conclusions as us.

The Solution For Castletown:

We are fairly confident that the council would like to be viewed as sustainable (self financing) and acts in the best interest of tax payers. Therefore it would be quite reasonable if the council were to implement a free RPS, such as that in Notts. One could argue a case for this based on allocated cash generating spaces, for the unique area of Castletown.

If there are approx 180 marked bay spaces in Castletown under the RPS, total revenue generated for the council (£35*180) would be £6300p/a. To ensure the council still obtains their revenue and residents pay absolutely nothing for the RPS, why not allocate around 6 on street bays adjacent to the station along railway street on a pay and display metered basis. This will mean that if the bays are used for 320 days a year at £4 a day the revenue generated will be £7680, thereby off setting the costs for residents.

We are convinced the metered spaces will be utilised as the current borough council parking charges undercut those of Network Rail and the demand is supplied by the train station.

For residents the savings are huge £100 in the first year and then a further saving of £50 each and every year after that.

In Summary:

We would like to know in detail how the charges for the RPS have been drafted and whether any investigations have been made into a free RPS. Despite making direct contact with your department via the telephone, all we have been told to date was that there was no published material in the public domain and no other charging options available. Surely if this is a public consultation then detailed published material should be freely available to ensure the council are acting in a transparent and accountable manner.

The success of the RPS will ultimately be judged by how many residents subscribe to it. In the event that the charges are too high or deemed unfair or an alternative was never looked at, residents will simply shun it and not use it. We hope to work together to find a win-win solution and would like to arrange a meeting to discuss the matter further.

With regards,

Tom Harris,

On behalf of Castletown Residents Association

ENDS

The tables included in the letter, detailing pricing in other areas can be downloaded here.

—

Letter to Castletown Residents (and anyone else who is interested)

Dear Friends and Neighbours,

the meeting at the Castle Tavern this Monday went very well and around 30 people attended. A straw poll showed there is overwhelming opposition to the Western Access Road plans amongst residents of both Castletown and Castlefields.

A request was made for the closing date of the consultation to be extended, however, I have seen an email from last week, from a senior officer involved in the scheme, stating that no extension will be granted.

As opposition to the road is growing a meeting is being held at 3pm on Sunday 13^th December at Trinity Church Hall with the aim of creating an umbrella-group for any organisation or individual to join. At the meeting the arguments against the plans will be outlined, a list of those wishing to join the umbrella-group created, and an action plan discussed and agreed on.

Also, it appears that the press coverage reporting this opposition has prompted the County Council to create a press release, which, it could be argued is either misleading, or attempting to exerting influence, or both.

The wording in the original consultation material, to my mind, appears incredibly biased. It could be argued the whole thing is designed to lead anyone reading it to the conclusion that the County Council wants them to arrive at. Have a look at the wording on the site and see if you agree. http://www.staffordshire.gov.uk/transport/staffshighways/schemeinfo/westernaccess/

This is the press release in question, which was presumably written in response to yesterday’s Express and Star front page story about Mike Shone of the Green Party calling for the plans to be scrapped.  http://www.staffordshire.gov.uk/news/press/Residents+make+their+views+known+on+access+route.htm

How can the County Council claim this is a fair consultation when this press release not only appears to seek to influence opinion, but also gives the impression the plans will go ahead whatever the public’s opinion is and whatever the results of the surveys show.

Statements such as “This is a major engineering project which will have a positive impact on Stafford’s infrastructure” gives the reader the impression that the decision has already been made and the road will be built regardless.

So is this consultation an elaborate sham? Do residents’ and council tax payers’ opinions count for nothing? Is anyone else getting the feeling someone is trying to pull the wool over our eyes?

It is no wonder that people feel powerless and apathetic towards politics and politicians when they are treated like this. Let us not forget that the ruling Conservative County Council group, 49 out of 62 County Councillors, were, by my calculations, elected by around 13% of the electorate. This is not an administration with a huge mandate and the backing of the majority of the people, quite the opposite.

Given the urgency of the January 8^th deadline, momentum has to be kept up. Sunday’s meeting promises to be a major step forward. I hope to see you there.

Invitation to the Umbrella-Group Meeting

This is a letter which is being sent out to Stafford organisations and individuals.

“Hello there, my name is Tom Harris and I am the Chairman of Castletown Residents’ Association.

You may have read in the local press that we held a meeting this Monday (7th December), to discuss the proposed Western Access Road. The result was clear – the overwhelming majority of residents are firmly opposed to this road being built. Other groups are now joining the calls to scrap the plans.

Time is very short as the consultation ends on Friday 8th January. Some are even suggesting the County Council deliberately picked the least opportune 6 weeks in the whole year in order to quell public debate. But it appears that nothing can stop the ever-growing calls of opposition. Castletown Residents’ Association wishes to continue to campaign against the road plans, but we cannot reach very many people on our own.

So, following discussions with various groups and individuals, a new meeting has been called, with the aim of creating a wider, umbrella-group to represent the combined voices of all groups opposing the plans.

Residents’Associations, sustainability, environmental and church groups, as well as individual Stafford residents are all being invited to attend the open meeting and join the as yet unnamed umbrella group. (Something along the lines of “Stop the Stafford W.A.R. (Western Access Road) has been mentioned, although any decision will be made at the meeting on Sunday).

At the meeting the arguments against the plans will be outlined, a list of those wishing to join the umbrella-group created, and an action plan discussed and agreed on. It has already been suggested that a website be set up for the umbrella-group, to provide information for general public. The creation of a template containing information and arguments against the proposals for each group to ‘personalise’ and pass around is another idea.

I hope you will be able to attend the meeting, which will take place at Trinity Church Hall, (just off Chell Road, opposite Sainsbury’s and Wilkinsons), on Sunday 13th December at 3pm. Please pass this email on to anyone who may wish to attend or get involved with the new umbrella-group.

I would be very grateful if you could let me know if you are planning to attend, so I can get an idea of numbers.

Please feel free to contact me if you require any further information.

Best regards, Tom Harris”

The proposed Western Access Route

Plans have been circulated in the press and also online for the proposed Western Access Road which, if it goes ahead, will affect Castletown greatly.

In order to discuss the options being put forward by the County Council Highways Department the Castletown Residents’ Association has called a special meeting, which will take place at 8pm on Monday 7th December at the Castle Tavern, Doxey Road.

This is clearly very short notice, but many residents have expressed grave concerns about some of the suggested routes. Also, since we are now in Advent  and the festive season, holding a meeting any later in the month would be impractical.

This bypass could make life hell for many residents in Castletown. Some people will be all for it and others dead-set against. At the meeting we aim to have guest speakers putting their cases for or against the different routes and a question and answer session. If the speakers each take 5 minutes to put their case the meeting need not take longer than an hour.

County Councillor Mark Heenan plans to attend and I know he has an open mind on the issue and is keen to hear residents’ views.

Of the four proposed options the yellow route would be devastating, shaving houses off Castle View and North Castle Street. Fortunately the County Council does not see this as their preferred route and there is a question on the survey which asks “Are you in favour of abandoning the old protection on the yellow route?. The answer has to be ‘yes’ as this could clear the way for the homes to be lived in again.

The blue route goes along the existing Doxey Road, which is already very busy, noisy and quite dangerous, as anyone driving out of Jerningham Street onto it will testify. If the County Council should chose the blue route, they could expect a huge campaign against it from residents.

Equally unattractive is the red route, through Doxey Marshes, which would be a catastrophe for the nature reserve.

This leaves the green route, (green for go – geddit?!), which is the County Council’s preferred route. This plan is likely to see the least outcry from both Castletown residents and those in favour of preserving the wonderful natural habitat of Doxey Marshes.

We are calling on Castletown Residents to attend the consultation event this Thursday 3rd at 7pm.

The meeting on Monday 7th is open to everyone who is interested and should have some very good discussion. I hope to see you there.

 

 

Residents’ Parking Scheme

Here are some of the residents’ concerns and hopes regarding the propose parking scheme:

Mrs W. writes:

“”I would be interested in others’ responses to the suggestion that the Resident Parking Scheme would be Vehicle-, and not House- , specific. This I believe to be very wrong indeed and my car-less neighbour, housebound and in her eighties, is deeply alarmed and distressed at the proposal. She and her home have as much right to a parking space in her own street as those with cars; having lived here over many, many decades now; her life and her lifelines depend on her carers and her supporters being able to park there: the nurses have to visit regularly to inject her and to deliver her medication, her wheelchair-bound son who has MS needs to be driven to visit her on a regular basis, Age Concern provide her with a weekly visit by a cleaner and she herself needs to be picked up from outside her own home for all of her own hospital, doctor, and any other appointments etc. In short, she and her home need to be allocated a parking permit. And I feel sure that she is not alone in this situation.”

Mr M. has several thoughts on the scheme and traffic in general:

“1)  The whole of Castletown enters the scheme or there simply won’t be enough spaces for residents and we will still get commuters cruising round hoping for free parking.  The only exception to be the SE end of South St by the new flats if the street can be stopped for through traffic, see item 9 below

2)  There is rebate or fee exemption provision for elderly, disabled, low income residents, carers etc

3)  All income from the scheme from fees and fines is fairly applied to the scheme and not syphoned off for the Council’s general fund.

4)  Permits are house-specific and not vehicle- specific so that residents without cars can get them (for use by their visitors)

5)  Double yellow lines, which were extended a few years ago, now sterilise more of the street than is needed for safety etc. These to be reviewed as suggested by the police at our recent meeting

6)  Access only order to apply throughout Castletown

7)  7.5 ton weight restriction to apply on all streets in Castletown except Castle Street (because of businesses accessed via Bagnall’s Bridge)

8)  No speed cushions like Doxey’s, but speed ramps like those at start of South Street at other ‘gateways’ also.

9)  South street to be stopped for through traffic at the kink/hammer-head.”

New CRA Blog

Hi there!

Thank you for visiting this blog, set up by me, Tom Harris, current chairman of Castletown Residents’ Association. The Association’s main aim is to encourage a strong sense of community.  Together we can make Castletown a better and safer place to live.

This blog has been created with the idea of communicating to both residents and anyone living outside of Castletown. This blog will not replace the residents-only Castletown Residents’ Network in any way, but should provide another outlet for information and discussion from our community.

I hope you find this blog useful and look forward to your comments.

Cheers!
Tom Harris

05/10/09